Jan 29, 2007
About Me
- Name: Patrick J. Fitzgerald
- Location: U.S. Attorney On Assignment - WDC, Illinois, United States
Think Globally Prosecute Locally - I grew up in Flatbush, kept my nose clean, went to law school. Now that I am in Chicago and D.C. I have found that the rampant graft and corruption to be a travesty - a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. ---Favorite quote --- "Conditional love is an oxymoron." - Yours truly
16 Comments:
Fitz!
I'll have some popcorn and beer!
LOL!
PS-Make Ari really uncomfortable this afternoon after lunch.
Fitz Ari is small peanuts he's to easy go for the big guns. Ari has already given the jurors one more lie from Libby on the list. Ari isn't to bright as he started ringing and twisting his hands remember Judge Walton told the jurors to watch carefully each witness to see if their telling the truth. Just the words broke Protocol did it. If Ari hadn't told the truth he would be the defend. Fitz and team remember the case is about lying and there will be more witnesses who leaked but didn't lie under oath.
Oh say hi to Randall for me. Fitz look in the mirror to make sure everything is ok before you head back in court.
I apologize for OTing, but someone was interested in the Frank Rich op-ed yesterday in the NYT which is only available by subscription and cannot be linked. I found the entire article on this site: http://theunknowcandidate.blogspot.com. It is, well, really Rich.
Jackie,
But Libby's lawyers assumed that Ari is "one" that could damaged their case. But, as you said, Ari is small peanuts to what Fitz has lined up for the defense. But, who is going to be the deep throat in the Libby case? We will find out.
Wouldn't it be funny if Turdblossom was deep throat? Maybe that's why Team Libby is trying to throw him under the bus!?
"I cannot be prosecuted for what I did with the information I was provided," Fleischer said. "The immunity provides no protection for perjury."
What did he do with the information, that he can't be prosecuted for? What did the people with whom he did what he did with the information, do?
You have to be a cunning linguist just to figure this sh!t out.
Digital LSD
Jackie,
On your comment on my blog, I agree with you. Ari did break protocol and the non-disclosure agreement which he signed at the time of his employment. I look for him to be one of the 10 John Doe gov't officials named in the Wilson's civil lawsuit. Interesting he left his WH job on July 14, 2003 when a week before that, he had lunch with Libby. He knew the writing on the wall and bailed out from his job.
Sounds like he did good.
For everyone.
Hey Subway!
Good to see you around..How are you doing?
Yeah, this trial is uncovering some dirty, dirty truth about the WH! (Like we didn't already know, though!)
Quick note from Pach: It's disorienting to see Ari Fleischer answer this many qustions in a row without dodging, weaving, fogging or lying. Bizarre indeed!
Cool.
I guess being under oath has different effects for different people.
Don't you wonder how much evidence Fitz is gathering in this trial, which he intends to use toward future indictments?
(Testimony is evidence, I've learned.) :)
I can only imagine, but I would think that would be a HUGE consideration. To figure out questions that are allowable in the context of this case, which in effect are gathering evidence to be used in the future.
(That's where brain power would really come in handy .....)
Posted Jan 22nd 2007 7:15PM by Sarah J. Gim
I didn't think leggings could really get any worse, unless this year saw the comeback of leggings' first cousin, the stirrup pant, but boy was I wrong. And when I say, "boy," I really do mean "boy." All the rage for this fall will be men in tights, and we're not talking about football.
At the Marni men's runway show in Milan last week, the designer sent men down the catwalk in leggings made of microfiber cotton and wool, which would not have been as bad if they were, say, black, but they were violet and forest green. And did I say stirrups pants would be worse than leggings? The men's leggings had stirrup straps.
I don't think that Patrick is the fashion-slave type, but in *case* he is tempted by this latest trend .....
(And I feel confident that I speak for Jackie as well...)
Don't do it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bovard/372918627/
Yer gonna die laughing.
They hung him naked in effigy.
Commander Codpiece indeed has been packing and compensating.
Stephanie @3:31:
At the Marni men's runway show in Milan last week, the designer sent men down the catwalk in leggings...
-------------------------
Down The Catwalk
hehe
Why does this blog always make me hungry?
Anon, I know what you mean.
Down the Catwalk - Not exactly my cup of tea. Who are they trying to impress with their neauseatingly blown-up egos?
D
Post a Comment
<< Home